• Home
  • Work
  • About
  • Contact
Soft Sensibilities
  • Books
    • Books
      • One Book a Day
    • Perfumed Papers
    • Resources 📢
      • #BlackLivesMatter
      • #StopAsianHate
      • #ProChoice
  • Beauty
    • All Beauty
    • Perfume
    • Skincare
    • Makeup
    • Favorites
    • Reviews
  • Style
    • All Fashion
    • Outfits
    • Runway
    • Tearsheets
  • Diary
    • All Life
    • Art
    • Thoughts
    • Travel
    • Five Things
  • ShopMy

10:15 AM: Anna Wintour Talks Feminism

7 November 2011 • Kimberly • Leave a Comment

“IT FIGURES, doesn’t it? Women are turning their backs on femininity just as it’s becoming a big profit center.”

—Harriet Rubin

Monday morning rituals consist of a bit of pilates and two cups of green tea, scalding hot followed by scouring the Twitter feed for news updates. Direct from WSJ’s blog, a few days late (as per usual) is the snippet from interview with Anna Wintour on Tokyo’s Fashion Night Out that caught my eye; interviewer Yoree Koh asks Anna Wintour her take on the controversial Vogue Japan feature of Renho, minister of government revitaliation, in an editorial last year that took place inside Japan’s Parliament building:

Ms. Wintour: “When women are in positions of power, and they’re featured in a women’s magazine like Vogue…they tend to be incredibly unfairly criticized. It’s an incredibly old-fashioned approach. Just because you’re in a position of power, and you look good and you enjoy fashion—does that mean you’re an idiot, or that it’s not seemly to be in a woman’s magazine? If a man is in GQ, they don’t get the same kind of criticism.”

Amennnn (!).

It’s all very Elle Woods—being torn between wanting to be recognized as “serious” and embracing femininity. We’ve undertaken a patriarchal view of what it means to be powerful: in order to achieve and gain respect as a leader, one must abandon  and forsake all aspects of woman-ity and take on masculine definitions of what power looks like.

The situation also reminds me all too well of Anna Wintour’s response to ex-Senator (now Secretary of State) Hillary Clinton turning down Vogue’s request for a photoshoot in 2008 (?):

“Imagine my amazement, then, when I learned that Hillary Clinton, our only female presidential hopeful, had decided to steer clear of [being photographed for] our pages at this point in her campaign for fear of looking too feminine. The notion that a contemporary woman must look mannish in order to be taken seriously as a seeker of power is frankly dismaying. (…)

How has our culture come to this? (…) This is America, not Saudi Arabia).”

Here’s to Anna Wintour.

.   .   .

For further reading, I suggest this article by Harriet Rubin.

x

{source via, via}

It's only sensible to share:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • More
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related


Discover more from Soft Sensibilities

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Filed Under: Current Affairs, Feminism, Philosophy, Style Tagged with: Anna Wintour, Girl Talk, Issues, Pearls of Wisdom, Quotes

Share

Facebook Google+ Twitter Pinterest Email

Your turn. Thoughts?Cancel reply

  1. Naghmeh says

    9 November 2011 at 7:51 pm

    I agree with what she says! I don’t even have to look very far to see this I see it around me everyday, and it’s a bit sad.
    well actually one of the reasons I haven’t told many about my own blog is this very reason. I’m in the science/health care field and I fear that if I do tell others about my blog I will be seen as a shallow, stupid and not very serious person.
    xx
    Naghmeh

    Loading...
    Reply
    • Kimberly Pearl says

      23 November 2011 at 11:45 am

      @Naghmeh: You’re intelligent, articulate and incredibly stylish (among other things). But I completely and totally understand. I’m currently in a business and journalism school, where if you even look like you give two hoots about how you carry yourself, you’re deemed as frivolous. It’s absolutely ridiculous.

      Only a few close friends know about my blog; I even hesitated in telling my family! It’s a bit pathetic, really, to feel like I — we — need to hide a part of ourselves… Glad to know I’m not alone though! x

      Loading...
      Reply

Back to Blog

Trackbacks

  1. fall couture 2012: versace | a bit coquettish says:
    25 July 2012 at 6:28 pm

    […] I have a predilection for society’s perception of hot. What is sexy? What is femininity? Is it possible to be a feminist even with such ideals? The short answer: yes. To get there, however, is neither simple nor so straightforward; […]

    Loading...
    Reply
  2. the “a bit coquettish” manifesto | a bit coquettish says:
    14 March 2013 at 10:03 am

    […] Is fashion frivolous? Yes, and no. I sometimes rant on about the inner debate. But it is far more dinner table friendly than politics. I am, for the record, a Democrat by choice and by birth apparently, and should that deter you from reading further, so be it! […]

    Loading...
    Reply

Browse

The Archive

Subscribe

All rights reserved. © 2026 Soft Sensibilities. Written by Kimberly Pearl.

%d