It’s easy to assume that the inspiration behind Diane von Furstenberg‘s spring collection was herself—well, DVF at Studio 54 circa 1976, big curls (swept to one side to make room for a spray of flowers) and a jewel-toned eyes. It’s what I—we—adore about DVF: she is always her own inspiration. What woman doesn’t strive for that level of self-acceptance and peace? (What woman doesn’t strive to be a Diane?)
Instead, Furstenberg encouraged each of her models to “think of the woman you want to be, and be that (WWD).” Embrace Fortuna’s essence; celebrate beauty, freedom, and nature—all of which the Roman goddess represented. It was Fortuna who was the muse, not DVF.
Still, I can’t help but think that unless Fortuna is DVF, or DVF a reincarnation of the otherworldly Fortuna, the look reminiscent of Furstenberg’s earlier years. Big, 70s hair by way of seductive waves, worn not unlike how the designer styled hers. Bright blooms on one side—something I’m planning to copy come spring next year—that complemented the makeup perfectly. I’ve yet to figure out how to emulate a smoky teal eye but once I do, I plan to make it my signature going-out look. I’ve been in love since I saw it in a favorite Gucci show years ago; one day, I tell myself. One day.
The clothes were beautiful. Pretty, vibrant, diaphonous—womanly—as always. Never too serious, but never a caricature of femininity. This collection was all about individuality—Fortuna—and it showcased exactly that. Embroidered hydrangea’s for some girls; draped gold for others. There was fringe, geometric kaleidoscopes, leopard trim. Deep Vs, square necks; wide-leg jumpsuits, disco minidresses. There were options for every woman and every facet of a woman, so much so that when the show came to a close, the finale was a wonder of visual fancy.
. . .
xx
{image via}
Your turn. Thoughts?